JE

Johannes C. Eichstaedt

Psychology; Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence

Stanford University

Hands-onClear VisionFriendly PeersRespects Privacy
3.8/ 5.0
8 student reviews
👍4
👎0
Loading...

About Johannes C. Eichstaedt at Stanford University (Stanford)

Johannes C. Eichstaedt is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Stanford University and a Shriram Faculty Fellow at the Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, where he directs the Computational Psychology and Well-Being Lab. He is a computational social scientist whose work sits at the intersection of psychology, data science, and artificial intelligence. His research focuses on how large language models and natural language processing can be responsibly deployed to support mental health, psychological wellbeing, and social good. He is particularly interested in identifying the conditions under which AI systems can safely deliver psychotherapy and wellbeing interventions. Over the past decade, he has pioneered methods in psychological text analysis, using large-scale social media data to infer psychological states such as emotion, motivation, and mental health at both individual and population levels. His work enables unobtrusive measurement of psychological wellbeing without relying on traditional surveys, with applications in public health, policy evaluation, and under-resourced settings. He co-founded the World Well-Being Project at the University of Pennsylvania, now a large international consortium in big data psychology, and continues to advance interdisciplinary approaches to understanding how language reflects and shapes human wellbeing.

Research Areas

computational psychologylarge language modelsmental healthwellbeingpsychological text analysissocial media analysisdata science for social goodmotivation and emotion

Rating Breakdown

Supervision Style4.3
Responsiveness3.8
Workload3.5
Funding Support3.5
Communication3.8

Reviews (4)

A
Anonymous12/19/2025
3.0

My contact was primarily via a joint project analyzing social media text over ~6 months. Supervision leaned toward autonomy: expectations were methodological rigor rather than day-to-day oversight. Email responses were reasonable but sometimes delayed. The lab is well-suited for self-directed students who have computational skills and care about ethical considerations in large-data work.

👍

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Respects Privacy

Anonymous quick feedback

5 months ago

👍

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Clear Vision

Anonymous quick feedback

5 months ago

👍

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Hands-on

Anonymous quick feedback

8 months ago

A
Anonymous12/5/2025
4.0

Lab culture leans toward balance. Will call out if someone's overworking. Annual progress expectations are clear upfront, which removes a lot of ambiguity.

👍

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Friendly Peers

Anonymous quick feedback

4 months ago

A
Anonymous8/12/2025
4.0

Thorough feedback on manuscripts, though the turnaround can stretch to 3-4 weeks if they're swamped with committee work. Fair expectations and genuinely invested in your success.

A
Anonymous7/23/2025
4.0

High expectations for lab meetings, sometimes brutally honest critiques, but you'll come out a better researcher. Demanding but supportive when things go wrong.

Frequently Asked Questions

Not sure how to interpret mixed signals? A structured decision guide can help you think through high-risk supervision choices more clearly. Download the free guide.

Johannes C. Eichstaedt Reviews | Stanford (Stanford University)