AcaRevival Initiative

Experienced academic misconduct or bullying? We're building a real weapon against it.

Read Manifesto β†’
DR

Daniela Rus

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Generous Stipend6Job Support3Hands-on3Emotionally Stable3Friendly Peers3On-time Grad2
15 student votes
πŸ‘15
πŸ‘Ž0
Loading...

About Daniela Rus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Daniela Rus is an academic professional affiliated with Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Their primary research focus includes Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence, Robotic Path Planning Algorithms, and Soft Robotics and Applications. As a highly cited researcher, their work has accumulated over 63,720 citations, reflecting substantial influence across the academic community. Their H-index of 122 further reflects the breadth and sustained impact of their scholarly contributions.

Research Areas

Modular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsSoft Robotics and ApplicationsDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsAdvanced Materials and Mechanics

Academic Impact Matrix

Research output metrics for Daniela Rus aggregated from public academic databases. Student lab experience data is pending.

Academic data verified Β· April 2026 Β· Next sync: May 2026

Research Output

Total Citations63,720

Top 5% globally

Publications1138

Highly prolific researcher

h-index122

Nobel-level impact

i10-index599

Exceptional breadth

Lab Environment

No lab data yet for Daniela Rus

+ Contribute First Review
  • Supervisionawaiting data
  • Responsivenessawaiting data
  • Fundingawaiting data
  • Communicationawaiting data
  • Work-Life Balanceawaiting data

Reviews (0)

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as On-time Grad, Emotionally Stable, Generous Stipend, and Respects Privacy

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

1 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Generous Stipend

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

9 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Hands-on

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

7 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Job Support

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

2 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Friendly Peers, Flexible Commitments, and Generous Stipend

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

1 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Generous Stipend

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

1 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Hands-on

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

2 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Job Support

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

1 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Generous Stipend

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

1 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Emotionally Stable

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

1 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Job Support

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

10 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Generous Stipend

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

1 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Overseas Link, Friendly Peers, Flexible Commitments, and Emotionally Stable

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

1 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as On-time Grad

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

2 months ago

πŸ‘

A student recommended this supervisor and marked them as Hands-on, Clear Vision, and Friendly Peers

Anonymous quick feedback

β€’

1 months ago

Is your PI driving you crazy?

Featured Article

The Sunday Night Dread: Surviving a Micromanaging PhD Supervisor

Real advice from PhD students on recognizing and navigating difficult supervisor relationships

Your experience matters. After reading the guide, share your review to help other PhD students.

Interview Experiences (1)

A
Anonymous12/19/2025
Difficulty:5/5
Communication:5/5

Expect big-picture plus systems thinking β€” explain how your idea scales and what safety/robustness tradeoffs you considered. Concrete experiments that show real-world feasibility are highly valuable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Not sure how to interpret mixed signals? A structured decision guide can help you think through high-risk supervision choices more clearly. Download the free guide.